Effectiveness of Interactive Teaching Methods on Students’ Performance in Social Studies and Civic Education: An Experimental Study in Nigerian Secondary Schools

Matthew Damilola Omojemite

doi:10.71514/jssal/2025.171

Authors

Matthew Damilola Omojemite Continuing Professional Teacher Development, Faculty of Education, Walter Sisulu University, South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71514/jssal/2025.171

Keywords:

Interactive teaching methods, social studies, performance, civic education.

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of interactive teaching methods on students’ academic performance in Social Studies and Civic Education in Nigerian secondary schools. The study adopted a quasi-experimental research design with a control group. The population consisted of 85,121 Junior Secondary School students from public secondary schools in Southwest Nigeria. A sample of 200 students was selected using a multistage sampling method involving both random and purposive sampling techniques. Two instruments, Social Studies Performance Test (SSPT) and Civic Education Performance Test (CEPT), were developed for data collection. Experts in Social Studies, Civic Education, and Educational Measurement validated the instruments. The reliability was established using the test-retest method, yielding reliability coefficients of 0.89 for SSPT and 0.84 for CEPT. The instruments were administered through pre-tests and post-tests after instructional interventions. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (t-test analysis and Regression ANOVA). Findings revealed that interactive teaching methods significantly improved students’ academic performance in both subjects compared to traditional teaching methods. Additionally, demographic factors such as gender, location, and age did not significantly influence student performance. It was recommended that teachers adopt student-centered teaching strategies, while policymakers should integrate interactive methods into curricula to enhance learning outcomes across diverse student demographics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, W. K., & Wieman, C. E. (2011). Development and validation of instruments to measure learning of expert-like thinking. International Journal of Science Education, 33(9), 1289–1312. https://doi.org/10.1080/095

Ajiboye, J. O., & Ajitoni, S. O. (2008). Effects of full and quasi–participatory learning strategies on Nigerian senior secondary students' environmental knowledge: Implications for classroom practice. The International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 3(1), 58–6

Brown, P. C., Roediger, H. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (2014). Make it stick: The science of successful learning. Harvard University Press.

Budini, N., Marino, L., Carreri, R., & others. (2019). Perceptions of students after implementing peer instruction in an introductory physics course. Smart Learning Environments, 6(20). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0101-6

Chi, M. T. H. (2009). Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 73-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x

Deterding, S., Sicart, M., Nacke, L., O'hara, K., & Dixon, D. (2011). Gamification. using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts. In CHI'11 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2425-2428). https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979575

Dong, X. (2016). Application of flipped classroom in college English teaching. Creative Education, 7(9), 1343–1348. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.79140

Echalico-Bermillo, J., & Merto, V. L. T. (2022). Collaborative strategic reading on students’ comprehension and motivation. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v7i1.4148

Encarnacion, R. E., Galang, A. D., & Hallar, B. A. (2021). The impact and effectiveness of e-learning on teaching and learning. International Journal of Computing Sciences Research, 5(1), 383-397. doi: 10.25147/ijcsr.2017.001.1.47.

Fayombo, G. A. (2012). Active learning: Creating excitement and enhancing learning in a changing environment of the 21st century. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 3(16), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2012.v3n16p107

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111

Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 39-54. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3

Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? —A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3025-3034. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377

Ibok, E. E., & Ntibi, J. (2021). Students' demographic factors and their academic achievement in Mathematics and Physics in Calabar Metropolis of Cross River State, Nigeria. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 4(1), 121-130.

Ihebom, B., & Uko, J. O. (2020). Challenges and prospects of secondary education in Nigeria. International Journal of Scientific Research in Education, 13(4), 670–688.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2014). Cooperative learning in 21st-century education. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 841-851.

Kalman, C. S., Lattery, M., & Sobhanzadeh, M. (2018). Impact of reflective writing and labatorials on student understanding of force and motion in introductory physics. Creative Education, 9(4), 571–593. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2018.94041

Kamran, F., Kanwal, A., Afzal, A., & Rafiq, S. (2023). Impact of interactive teaching methods on students' learning outcomes at university level. Retrieved from https://ww w.researchgate.net/publication/372289203

Kerimbayev, N., Umirzakova, Z., Shadiev, R., & others. (2023). A student-centered approach using modern technologies in distance learning: A systematic review of the literature. Smart Learning Environments, 10(61). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00280-8

Mandasari, B. (2020). The impact of online learning toward students’ academic performance on business correspondence course. EDUTEC Journal of Education and Technology, 4(1), 98-110. https://doi.org/10.29062/edu.v4i1.74

Matos Junior, M. A. D., Francisco, A. C. D., & Matos, E. A. S. A. D. (2020). Problem-based learning in the Brazilian Congress of Engineering Education since 2010 up to 2019: A systematic literature review. Creative Education, 11(7), 1157–1172. https://doi.or g/10.423 6/ce.2020.11708.

Murikah, W., Nthenge, J. K., & Musyoka, F. M. (2024). Bias and ethics of AI systems applied in auditing: A systematic review. Scientific African, 18, e02281. https://doi.or g/10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02281.

Obi, Z. C. (2020). The need for innovative instructional strategies in the teaching and learning of science in Nigeria: The role of schools. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340232222

Oliverio, A. (2023). Social action explanation and intentions in sociology and social sciences. Advances in Applied Sociology, 13(8), 415–430. https://doi.org/10.4236/aasoci.2023.138036

Polat, S. (2020). Multidimensional Analysis of the Teaching Process of the Critical Thinking Skills. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 5(2), 134-157. doi.org/10.46303/ressat.05.02.8

Riordan, A., Echeverria, V., Jin, Y., Yan, L., Swiecki, Z., Gašević, D., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2024). Human-centred learning analytics and AI in education: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100215

Slavin, R. E. (2019). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (12th ed.). Pearson.

Smith, A. (2023). Student learning and literacy practices when video games are incorporated into a secondary classroom (Publication No. 1871) [Master’s thesis, Illinois State University]. Illinois State University Theses and Dissertations. https://ir.library. illinoisstate.edu/etd/1871

Sulaiman, A. H., & Abdullah, S. A. (2024). The use of active learning strategies to foster effective teaching in higher education institutions. Zanco Journal of Humanity Sciences, 28(2), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.21271/zjhs.28.2.11

Tlhoaele, M., Hofman, A., Winnips, K., & Beetsma, Y. (2014). The impact of interactive engagement methods on students' academic achievement. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(5), 1020-1034. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.890571

Utama, I. M. P. (2020). Think-pair-share strategy in teaching reading at the second semester students of IKIP Mataram. Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching), 4(2), 87. https://doi.org/10.33394/jo-elt.v4i2.2446.

Wijnia, L., Noordzij, G., Arends, L. R., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Loyens, S. M. M. (2024). The effects of problem-based, project-based, and case-based learning on students’ motivation: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 36, Article 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09864-3

Yaakobi, T., Rimon Or, A., & Getahun, S. (2023). A framework to the understanding of educational attitudes: A convergence of social psychology, psychoanalysis, philosophy of education. Psychology, 14(6). https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2023.146051.