Overview of the Peer Review Process

The Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Language (JSSAL) employs a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure the quality and integrity of published research. In this process, the identities of both the authors and reviewers are concealed to maintain impartiality.

All submitted manuscripts are evaluated by at least two independent international reviewers with expertise in the relevant subject area. The peer review process assists the editor in making informed editorial decisions and provides constructive feedback to authors.

Step 1: Submission

  • Authors submit their manuscripts via the online submission system.
  • An acknowledgment email is sent to confirm receipt.

Step 2: Editorial Pre-Screening

  • The editorial team reviews submissions within two weeks for scope, originality, and formatting.
  • Unsuitable manuscripts are desk-rejected with a reasoned decision.

Step 3: Assignment of Reviewers

  • Two reviewers are selected based on subject expertise via databases like Scopus or Web of Science.
  • Reviewers must be independent and disclose conflicts of interest within 48 hours.

Step 4: Review Process

Reviewers evaluate based on:

  • Originality of the research contribution
  • Theoretical and methodological soundness
  • Coherence and clarity of analysis
  • Language, structure, and readability

Typical review time is 4–6 weeks. All reviews are confidential and must be objective.

Step 5: Editorial Decision

  • Accept without revisions
  • Accept with minor revisions (2–4 weeks)
  • Revise and resubmit (4–8 weeks)
  • Reject

Step 6: Production

Accepted manuscripts go through copyediting, layout formatting (PDF/HTML), and proofreading before publication.

JSSAL adheres to COPE Guidelines on Peer Review.

Handling Disputes in Peer Review

Conflicting Reviewer Reports

If reviewers provide contradictory recommendations, an additional reviewer may be assigned. Final decisions are made by the Editor based on all reports and academic merit.

Author Appeals

Authors may submit appeals within 14 days of the decision with a written justification. Appeals are reviewed by the Editor-in-Chief and, if necessary, additional reviewers or board members.

Reviewer Bias or Misconduct

Reports showing bias, inappropriate language, or undisclosed conflicts of interest are excluded. A new reviewer is assigned when needed.

Quality Control

The editorial team monitors review quality. Reviews that lack justification or show dismissive tone may trigger re-review or editor intervention.

All dispute cases are handled in line with COPE Flowcharts to ensure transparency and fairness.

For more details, see our Publication Policy.